this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
24 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23307 readers
162 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Asking semi-seriously.

The Socialist Workers' Sport International (although I prefer its German name Sozialistische Arbeitersport Internationale as it was abbreviated as SASI) was formed in Switzerland in 1920. They organized three International Workers' Olympiads between 1925 and 1937 to offer a less classist version of The Olympics, which especially in the early days of its modern revival upheld a view of sportsmanship that was very upper class coded and upholding idealized images of a privately educated "gentleman amateur" who was an "all-rounder" who didn't specialize or excel in one particular area. The events emphasised international cooperation, shared class struggle, and solidarity above national identity.

If we were to bring the spirit of this idea into the modern age, would the obvious candidate not be the Eurovision Song Contest. Like the Olympics, it's based on international competition. and people have complained for decades that most countries just end up voting for their closest ally. Then there's the fact that the EBU still refuses to bar the genocidal apartheid state of Israel.

So do we need a "Prole-Oh-Vision" (Never said I was good at naming things. Fuck You. What are you going to contribute?) Song Contest? Keeping the libs and reactionaries out would solve most of the problems with Eurovision. You wouldn't even need to ban Israel, because any Israeli who believed in internationalism, shared struggle, and liberation for all wouldn't be a zionist.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Omission is complicity, a lesser evil than "just following orders" but still an evil.

To be a communist one has to be in a, let me see, community. In this case, an organization. Sympathizers aren't communists, they don't provide praxis. One can't be a communist alone, that's why it's so difficult to infuse communist values in the intrinsically individualist US population.

Lemmy is nice, but it also exists to let you guys know what is like out there.

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What would an American need to do to qualify as a communist in your eyes and do you think any such Americans exist?

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To me, a real communist isn’t just someone flying the label. It’s someone who actually sees capitalism as a specific, exploitative system and not just “""greedy people doing bad stuff""”. Who views the state as structurally built to protect the owning class, so the whole strategy is about building independent working-class power from below, not just electing nicer managers (i.e. communism won't come out of ballots). Who actually wants to abolish the entire boss/worker setup, wage labor, and private ownership of the big stuff, replacing it with a democratically planned economy oriented around human need. Who instinctively sides with workers in other countries and despises their own nation’s imperial adventures because solidarity doesn’t stop at borders. Who backs all that up with the unglamorous, face-to-face organizing work: shop-floor talks, tenant meetings, serious party-building. Instead of just treating communism as an online aesthetic.

Overcoming American individualism is a slow, non-linear process of unlearning. You have to let go of the shame attached to depending on others, the reflex to blame yourself or your neighbors for systemic misery, and the comfort of thinking you can opt out of class struggle if you just try hard enough. A person becomes a communist not when they just adopt a new set of opinions, but when they start experiencing themselves as part of a class and act accordingly. That's almost always born from the friction between the American dream and the brutal reality of life, combined with the lived experience of collective struggle. The individualism never fully vanishes (lifelong cultural programming). But organizing is the cure because it teaches you that "we" can do what "I" never could.

And because this is adressed to Americans, one has to talk about systemic racism. Racial issues aren't an add-on. A white worker who thinks class unity means ignoring racism is a liability. A POC who thinks racial liberation can happen without smashing capitalism is, from a communist view, a naïve liberal. The goal is multiracial working-class solidarity forged in a common struggle that takes on both exploitation and racial oppression head-on. Overcoming individualism means overcoming racial individualism too i.e. the idea that you can escape alone, or that your group can get a slightly bigger slice of a pie of shit. That's one of the hardest leaps for an American to make.

[–] UmbraVivi@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you think any such Americans exist?

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I dunno but the world needs them