this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
14 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11998 readers
242 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The counterpoint (and it's a deeply shitty, cynical counterpoint) is that the original targets weren't realistic to begin with, and would have been missed, just like every other climate target ever.

Is this better? History suggests it probably isn't. Is it worse? Maybe, but the depressing truth is it might just be a lateral move.

And that's the strongest "defense" I'm able to muster, which is pretty depressing.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

You're right that it's a deeply shitty and cynical counterpoint. In terms of realpolitik, you probably aren't wrong.

Trudeau talked a great game but repeatedly fumbled the implementation. Maybe if his government has done a better job with the branding and politicisation of the various carbon taxes we'd be in a better spot. But we aren't.

At best we can say this steals some of the thunder from the separatists.

yay national unity