this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
23 points (100.0% liked)

Movies & TV

23765 readers
109 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was split on if it went here or in slop

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MolotovHalfEmpty@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago

He's a technical obsessive who is much more interested in playing with the complex mechanisms of film production and display than he ever has been with more grounded narrative or character.

The only movies he's made with satisfying, interesting, memorable plots and characters - or really any heart at all - are those he co-wrote with his brother. Frankly, my hot take is that Jonathan is the more well rounded and talented creative of the two, despite his work usually recieving less accolades.

Tom Shone wrote a book about Christopher Nolan that called him the "greatest living filmmaker or the Victorian era" in reference to his firmly old school establishment upbringing and existence, as well as some of his anxieties. There was a brilliant analysis of it and Nolan's work in the LA Review of Books that lends a more critical eye to the Victorian cultural influences and imperialist traditions that underpin much of his work, which I think is spot on.