this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
22 points (92.3% liked)

Asklemmy

54292 readers
471 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have been reading a lot that 90% of their code is AI generated, companies are pushing developers to use AI as it makes them fast. But I am a little cautious of believing them. Is it true? Also sorry I didn't find a css career subreddit so I am asking here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] emmy5482@quokk.au 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Linters have existed for a long time. They were the original AI that generated code. Using AI to supplement work in a similar manner isn't replacing devs.

So I'vw never used a linter that generates code. I've used them to enforce code styles but never to generate code. And code generation isn't really the point there.

Second. AI isn't replacing devs? The massive layoffs in the tech sector would disagree. Its also not "dogshit apps". Google claims 90% of their code is generated and Microsoft claims 30% both come coupled with massive layoffs. To be fair Microsoft is kinda dogshit and Google search sucks now. But googles apps remain higher quality.

If the centrist argument is just to shrug and say "I guess we're stuck with it". I guess I'd say you aren't a centrist and are a tacit supporter of ai.

[โ€“] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say AI isn't replacing devs. I specifically mentioned stuff like Claude code and people that generate complete apps from AI. That work is dog shit. Using it as a glorified search engine is not the same thing. You're strawmaning this argument by selectively picking words without context from my response. Debate in good faith or don't respond.

[โ€“] emmy5482@quokk.au 1 points 9 hours ago

Its not like you can have one without the other. But I've found that people demanding responses in "good faith" are rarely engaged in it themselves.

The comment you reaponsed to asked why you aren't more angry about it. And you responded in support, without any reason why you wouldn't be mad, and also that it was only taking "bad" jobs.

But I specifically mentioned work at microsoft and Google which aren't "dog shit".