this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
317 points (97.9% liked)

politics

29742 readers
2392 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why didn't he cut any of NYPD's draining (and harmful) budget. Wtf?

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Police have a lot of leverage power.

Almost all police are part of some form of union, and they have the ability to say "fuck you, we're not going to respond to emergency calls if you don't give us what we want"

...

aaaaaaand they'll use that tactic to force cities not to implement alternatives to police, like qualified, unarmed, de-escalation trained mental health experts that handle certain situations better than cops, so police retain a total monopoly over state violence and decisions about if someone should be arrested or not... which then lets them keep their bargaining power to do it all over again.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wasn't Mamdani saying the whole campaign that he promised to keep the NYPD budget in return for the NYPD refocusing on violent crime and the NYPD leadership staying? If he pissed off the entire NYPD things would probably be more expensive.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter what he said, he's kind of at the mercy of (shitty) police unions.

Just look at how they responded when de Blasio dared to level even the most tepid criticism.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cops in my city just stopped working after 2020.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

Yeah, increasingly I've noticed cops just not giving a fuck about the law and doing whatever they want

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cut their funding in half and see how much power they have.

They are superfluous. That's kinda the point. We don't need them to respond to calls. Give half their funding to other people without guns to respond to calls.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

We don't need them to respond to calls

Exactly, the last time the NYPD went on strike, crime went down lmao

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Crime didn't go up last strike

In contrast to the Boston Police Strike of 1919, and the Montreal strike of 1969, there was no surge of crime or unrest.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

I'm taking about 2015.