this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
564 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

84567 readers
4579 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] manxu@piefed.social 123 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Imagine you are so dumb, you decide to rename your company for its biggest failure, and then you get to fire everybody else because they are redundant. Facebook renaming itself Meta is like Tesla changing its name to Cybertruck Inc.

I can't wait until the AI bubble is over and drags the worst people under.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Is AI the final bubble they'll inflate? Usually some new tech gets hyped when the old tech fails. See the progression through deep learning, Blockchain, NFT. Or will they do robotics and suddenly it's robots everywhere. Maybe quantum computing.

[–] vathecka@lemmy.radio 1 points 23 hours ago

Ai Is also a highly specialized technology with a limited number of use cases. though you cant brute force improvement through scaling like you can with ai, so it wouldnt be as good of an investment capital black hole

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Quantum computing will only be useful to a handful of people instead of mass consumer use. Quantum computers are mainly for cybersecurity.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

only be useful to a handful of people

So in the end it's even more useful than the metaverse or NFT, and they hyped that shit up like crazy.

[–] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Quantum processors are already a thing. I dont think we'll see quantum powered consumer products for a while but I think they will eliminate the need for massive data centres and should be way better for the environment.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I dont think we'll see quantum powered consumer products for a while

Or ever. Quantum processors have to operate close to 0k to work

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Idk, Miles Dyson was able to engineer a neural-net processor with room temperature superconductors all the way back in 1995...

[–] TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you think we'll see instead. When it comes to tech, id never say never. But I know what you mean.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When it comes to tech, id never say never.

Eh, there is a degree to that, but there's also the fact that you can't just break thermodynamics. With quantum effects you need to remove a lot of noise, and near-0k temperatures will do that.

Not only that, is there even a practical purpose to getting quantum computing on an individual level? While it's better for specialized problems, current transistor tech is way better at general use cases and is good enough that we don't really need significantly more power. And even if it was technologically possible to shrink dpwn quantum computing enough to fit in a desktop of phone, what's going to be the cost of it compared to transistors?

Only small parts of specific algorithms get a boost from quantum computing. I could imagine the NAG library offering quantum as a service for some of their routines

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

You mean for computation

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

AI is kind of different just because of the magnitudes of investments and loans at stake.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah. I mean blockchain is sorta resource intensive but more distributed. Crypto is basically the same thing. AI requires gigawatts of power, is disrupting almost every tech based manufacturing, uses tons of natural resources. All to create terrible content, hallucinate completely made up answers, and automate things to destroy themselves. Great idea guys.

Do get me wrong, I’m not totally against AI. I think it can be a useful tool especially if sandboxed and run locally. But these giant data centers sucking up all the electricity and water are just no bueno.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

It does feel like the moment when somebody pushes ask their chips forward and declares all-in.

[–] entwine@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

Tbf, Tesla probably sold more cyber trucks than Horizons got users.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

i think meta largely survives because they got people addicted to instagram, FB via propaganda, and now whatsapp. if it was just solely FB they have, it wouldve been a different sotry.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Meh some people just use it I just use it for Facebook marketplace and porn.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

XxxCyberTrucKxxX corporation.

More like XxXCyberTrucKKK