edit: i'm genuinely not sure i understand what you've been disagreeing with me on? is it that the education system didn't teach people to recognize a totenkopf, or that they shouldn't? because they didn't successfully do so, and i'm saying they should have made a point to.

ok, since this apparently isn't clear to you somehow, when i say that normal people don't recognize this symbol because fascist societies don't teach people anything, i'm making the implicit claim that i think they should. i'm not saying that they tried not to show people. i'm not saying people were denied the opportunity to see it during the education. i'm saying that if people were taught to recognize it then they would, but recognizing symbols used by any existing white supremacist militant groups isn't a priority in fascist society. i'm not denying that people have seen the totenkopf: i'm saying it's not surprising that they don't pick up on it being a specific nazi design. my wife has obviously seen the totenkopf before. she didn't realize it was a design that was specific to the nazis. because normies don't notice symbols they aren't taught to notice. i have no clue what you're even arguing with me about if you agree with that, which you seem to. i don't know why you took this entire conversation as apparently a condemnation of the education system in terms of practice and not design or something.

Not because they were not presented with the option to learn this information.

no man, the point is they didn't learn because normies don't learn anything you don't beat them over the head with, and obviously they should be beat over the head with recognizing hate symbols. which again, you seem to be saying as well, i'm really confused what point you're even fighting.