this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
73 points (100.0% liked)
technology
24373 readers
141 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Water evaporation tends to be a very small conveyance loss in canals. I've found sources saying 0.24% of total inflow, so a 70% reduction still probably doesn't justify the increased construction cost by itself..
If it doesn't significantly increase maintenance and repair costs of either the panels or the canal it's probably still a good idea.
Bifacial panels, which get energy from both sides, would benefit from light reflecting off of the water surface. At least on the surface it seems like this is a pretty ideal situation for those.
Which it probably does? I mean, the whole "put solar panels over highways" shtick had the same main issue.