this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
56 points (73.3% liked)

News

36943 readers
2241 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Apples and oranges. If you are a cashier and theft occurs you aren't paid enough to risk anything, including your life, to stop theft. Companies can hire more asset protection people.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

In Canada off-duty cops do that job AND get those hours added onto their retirement fund ... that we taxpayers pay for.

#ACAB

[–] bobman@unilem.org -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What? I like using self-checkout.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] bobman@unilem.org -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry, I'm not reading any of that.

Would you like to use your words and tell me what you want to say?

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He was giving you sources so you could understand his viewpoint and see if it holds merit outside of anecdotal experience.

Do you think the way you responded fosters good faith conversation?

[–] bobman@unilem.org -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Absolutely. Shoving a wall of text in someone's face that you didn't type and saying "read this" is not worth my time.

If you want effort, put forth effort. I can also link to a plethora of stuff and say "read this," but I won't because it's a waste of time and you can find any information you want on the internet.

Sorry this needs to be spelled out for you. You'll understand it as you get older.

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Damn dude, do you gotta be a cunt on the internet for no reason or is it fun? They've been saying that same "you'll get it when you're older" since I was in school and that's been a minute. Normally it came from some small minded blowhards, but I'll give you benefit of the doubt.

Their effort was to find the sources for you that purport their claim. It's not a big nuanced argument, they presented what they thought, you asked a question about what they meant, they linked you supporting information so you could be aware.

It's not their job to dissect the sources for you, it's their job to present their argument and if you didn't get it then they link you the bits they used. If you still don't get it, stop engaging with the person who linked sources.

When you were in school, did they teach you how to evaluate sources from multiple forms of media? Because the internet wasn't as massive as it is today when I was taking those classes, but they still taught how to go through a magazine, website, book, and video sources to identify the bias and reliability of the source.

If the only conversations you're having a full text and no one is linking to a source when they're making a claim, you're having a conversation, not a discussion or debate. It's why people cite their sources for published pieces, gotta check for plagiarism and you have to identify where you got information you claim is factual, it's just part of having those kinds of communications.

[–] bobman@unilem.org -3 points 2 years ago

Look dude, I get it. You seem upset because I don't see the value in being linked a wall of text on the internet. It's because I've been there, many times, and it overwhelmingly is not worth taking seriously.

Like I said, you'll understand this when you have more experience. I'm tired of repeating myself, and taking your insults.

I'm gonna block you now. Goodbye.