this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
261 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

84376 readers
4107 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works -2 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

The thought is it is the sick that need a doctor

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not certain that spending time on networks that are "void of lgbt, void of the trans" is the doctor that these people need to cure them of their transphobia and homophobia.

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

People not like me are evil! Being constantly hateful about nature ... their "god's" own invention. How blasphemous.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but their mentality is that it is a disease. Also I think the saying "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure" applies here.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 9 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Their mentality is wrong, and being lgbt neither needs preventing nor curing.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I never said it was right, it's just thier mentality

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Medical experts have come around to homosexuality not being a disease since the 70's (in USA) so I'd hope the mentality you speak of is diminished now.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

By repeating those claims you are perpetuating those harms, regardless of what you “really believe.”

[–] MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca 0 points 18 hours ago

No.

It's good to understand why people, even those with whom we disagree, are making the decisions they are making.

I'm sure you would rather those who disagree with you seek to understand why you make the choices you do etc.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 0 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a firm believer in know your enemy

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Then you know better than most that there is enough darkness in this world, and no need for you to write more of it

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

To ignore it is to give it more power to grow. The 1930's proved ignoring it doesn't make it go away

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

“The Jews could have prevented the holocaust if they’d just played devil’s advocate a little harder” is one of the most morally reprehensible takes I’ve ever seen in an online space, and one I simply cannot believe anyone can make in good faith.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago

I was refering to the US and UK and France. National problems have to be handled by nations. Like I told someone else in a different thread, I'm not your enemy here.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

And Jesus says literally everyone is sick and the only cure is to embrace selfless love for all. So why are they pretending they can fix it with draconian authoritarian dipshittery?

Oh, right, it's because they don't care about Christ, they're just leaning on the social leverage provided by espousing a Christian identity. My mistake.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works -2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

draconian authoritarian dipshittery

So long as it is voluntary, I'm alright with it. Let people choose what's best for themselves. If it attempts to get codified into law, that's a different matter.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Is it voluntary? How voluntary? Is it voluntary like, something a random stranger might decide is best for them, or voluntary like someone was raised by an abusive religious family so this seems normal to them despite science proving otherwise? Voluntary like someone convinced them they'd go to eternal damnation if they didn't go along with it?

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Voluntary as in I can choose a different mobile operator.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You can, but can everyone? We're talking about a demographic that only exists because they're hypocrites who enforce their religion of peace through violence at every level of society. I don't care if you think they have a choice because I already know how they feel like they have no other choice at all, because of the forces which shaped their worldview.

There's nothing voluntary about it for the target audience, and that's the only reason it could ever possibly succeed.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

can everyone?

That's a different question with all the laws passed since 9/11 revolving around random people being able to easily get a phone with no ID, no bank account, etc like they are going to the store to get a gallon of milk. The patriot act can die in a fire. If you want to affect change to make smuggling an unrestricted phone to someone in a cult, the patriot act has to go.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's not a different question, it's just looking at the issue from further away than halfway up your nose.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Easy access to other avenues is the first step in digital independence from an authoritarian family. It's the same thing for minors getting access to birth control without ID or parental concent. So long as you gotta have a bank account and show ID to buy a phone, this is going to be a problem.

[–] SarahValentine@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, so why are you defending the avenue that suckers in people afraid of hellfire and tells them all the others are satanic?

You have no point, nothing of value to say. You just keep circling back to defending this christofascist bullshit. This conversation is over.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

I'm not defending it, it is just the reality we face for freedom. It is just their mentality and how they see things vs how the next person sees it or you see it or how I see it. I'm not your enemy here.

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

And weekly affirmation that what their ingesting is real. You may have a point.