89
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] regul@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

If the Russian ideology and the American ideology are the same, and Ukraine's getting one of them either way, how can you feel like there's a side that's worthy of support?

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 38 points 11 months ago

This is an extremely weird way of seeing geopolitics, as "ideology" spreading. It's very neo-con and American.

It's about destroying the NATO army of the world empire. It's that simple

[-] regul@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

Yeah it doesn't really seem like that's happening or has any chance of happening from this conflict.

The US has been losing wars since the 50s, and they're not even getting any American teenagers killed in this one.

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's already happened. Ukraine's military is decimated, they've lost 90% of their men and can't mount any further attacks. They were built up from 2014-2022 to be the largest military in Europe, they were destroyed, they were re-built with massive donations from NATO and now they have been destroyed again. NATO has no more juice to squeeze. Russia has destroyed a massive portion of NATO's munitions and have broken apart the largest military in Europe twice. Nobody else could have done this.

De-dollarization and multipolarity has already made massive strides in just the last few years, as the rest of the world moves away from the west after seeing it's actions in this conflict. America bought a few more years for itself by cannibalizing and destroying the industrial base of Europe and especially Germany, but in the long run their western bloc is breaking down and weakening. This is unlike Iraq, with those we didn't see massive moves towards de-dollarization and multipolarity. And unlike the cold war, there seems to be only 2 camps instead of 3 - the golden billion and the other 6 outside the garden walls. The westoids and restofus

[-] regul@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

I mean China could have done it easily. But this is like saying the US is done for because the South Vietnamese army crumbled.

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Were there massive moves away from the USD due to the collapse of the South Vietnamese Army? Was the industrial base of Europe de-industrialized when America lost in Vietnam? No, unfortunately not. Things are moving now.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 7 points 11 months ago

I'd say moves away from the USD have more to do with the economic moves that China is making rather than the war in Ukraine. India's new right-wing nationalist government moving away from a non-Trump US was kind of a given, too.

This stuff all seems like it could have been happening without thousands of people dying at war.

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

So this all started rapidly moving in February 2022 coincidentally? Right after Russia's reserves were seized and massive sanctions were imposed on the biggest resource and energy exporters on earth? India and China were backing up Russia and gave them assurances they would not sanction. This started the shift as massive amounts of cheap energy flowed into China/India while the EU began to disintegrate economically without cheap energy. This changes the global calculus, it moves everyone away from the US except for the EU. Saudi Arabia and OPEC nations were alienated by sanction attempts by the EU to control gas prices, and also by Russian reserves being illegally seized. This started the shift in the middle east away from Israel and towards Iran, as Saudi Arabia turned neutral and spurned Israel/The US.

Now we have an Iran-China-Russia bloc, with India and Saudi Arabia and Brazil following quietly behind, torn between them and the west. It will no longer be a US dominated world in a few short decades at this rate. Their web of global policing unraveled and contained.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

And not a single Ukrainian or Russian had to be blown up for that to happen.

Russia's recognition of Luhansk and Donetsk would have likely triggered sanctions and/or firming up of alignments without a single shot being fired.

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes, unfortunately they did because the Ukrainians broke the Minsk ceasefire 22,000 times in the days leading up to the SMO. 14,000 Ukrainians dead in Donbas before the invasion already. I'm sorry, but this is all incredibly naive. The second the Americans installed a Nazi junta into power in 2014 the war was required and inevitable.

Russia tried for 8 years to stall and negotiate and get Ukraine to fucking chill and stop the ethnic cleansing but they never did, they kept increasing aggression. They kept breaking ceasefires. The west admits now those ceasefires were purposeful lies to buy time to get more weapons to more nazis. They never had any intention of making peace, it was a project of proxy damage against Russia.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

I disagree with most of your characterization of events.

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago
[-] regul@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago

Just so happens that your characterization of events is identical to Russia's.

I wouldn't trust the narrative provided by a capitalist state if they told me it was raining in the middle of a hurricane but I'm just built different I guess.

[-] SixSidedUrsine@hexbear.net 34 points 11 months ago

Just so happens that your characterization of events is identical to Russia's.

A hexbear calling another hexbear a Putin Shill. Never thought I'd see the day. Unfortunately for you,@ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net's characterization happens to line up with what has been demonstrated to be actually true. Once again, it turns out that reality has a material bias.

I wouldn't trust the narrative provided by a capitalist state if they told me it was raining in the middle of a hurricane but I'm just built different I guess.

That's exactly what you're doing, though. You're trusting the narrative provided by the world hegemon, the very worst of capitalist states. And you're regurgitating that narrative for them. It's pretty gross.

[-] regul@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

Declaring that Ukraine unilaterally violated Minsk II is not a defensible position.

[-] ProxyTheAwesome@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago

Yours just so happens to be a lazy one that leftists in the west seem to consistently arrive at after doing zero investigation or research. So we're at an impasse.

this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15866 readers
425 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS