this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
131 points (86.6% liked)

Technology

84699 readers
5666 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eli@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

It's hilarious how Apple was caught off guard to begin with.

Just going off of the triangle of "cheap-fast-good", the Neo literally hits all three categories really well.

The majority of standard users only need a web browser nowadays. I'm not sure if it can view/sign PDFs and send print jobs, but I'm sure it can, and all of this covers the 99% use case for a household device.

I'm the tech guy of the family. Linux nerd, GrapheneOS on my phone, blah blah blah. If my mom needed a new laptop I would 100% recommend the Neo and be done with it. No frills, no bullshit. Shit I want to pick one up just to play around with it because it's CHEAP, even though I dont like Apple's ecosystem.

I'm not sure how it would fare as a college device(test taking, remote screen sharing, proprietary programs, etc) but even for middle schoolers and high schoolers this should cover most, if not all, bases.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

We got one for my sister in law, and she likes it for college.

She wanted to just use an iPad, but she had to have macOS for the proprietary test tool spyware. It runs on the neo

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think Neo goes with a typical Apple premium, so it's not cheap for what it offers, BUT:

  • Many people are ready to pay that premium, maaning other manufacturers need to go way below that mark with a similar hardware, which benefits us, and
  • This is closest we've seen to a netbook for a while. This is good, we need them back!
[–] eli@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

netbook

Damn, I haven't heard that in a long time...and you're completely right. It is a netbook and we do need more of those in this new world(even though I don't like what that means(ownership of hardware or lack thereof)).

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair I would say the vast majority of Mac users are using their machines purely for browsing, note taking, etc regardless of what model they're on. Most buy a Mac so they can prop open the lid and show off the Apple logo to everyone else. It's a status symbol, it's a flag of conformity.

So the Neo fills that niche without spending an arm and a leg to do so AND you can actually easily repair some things on it. As a netbook it's perfect.

Mac users are using their machines purely for browsing, note taking, etc

That and battery life. Apple’s chips are amazingly power efficient. If I’m going to a long meeting for work and don’t expect to have easy access to a power outlet, I’m going to grab an iPad or Mac instead of my work laptop. I prefer Windows’ desktop environment, (Apple seems to design for “different” instead of “better” UI), but the battery life on Windows laptops tends to be like half of what a comparable Mac (or an iPad) will achieve.

Basically, there’s a reason Macs tend to be propped open for long periods of time. It’s because a Windows laptop would have already run out of battery 45 minutes ago.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My college kids do everything through cloud services, so it shouldn’t really matter what their device is.

  • One of them has a Mac and is just finishing his first year with no problems, so I would expect a neo to be no different.
  • My older kid jumps among an iPad in class, his laptop when necessary, and his gaming rig in his dorm, and has had no issues

On the other hand, my niece has very specific requirements for her major, so there will always be a few specialties

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's fine for all those use cases. The M1 Air rocks all that 5 years later.

Also: install xcode, then

/bin/bash -c "$(curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Homebrew/install/HEAD/install.sh)"

or something like that, and stretch macOS a little. I bet if they refresh the model with 12 GB of RAM running emulation and virtualization will be hot.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I wish using their os wasn't so painful coming from linux

Like, why is bash ancient? (3.2 vs 5)

Why is there no package manager (brew doesn't count, just as npm doesn't count as a legitimate package manager)

Why are the utils like ls and friends flag-order-sensitive (you can ls -lah . but not ls . -lah)

Why do I have 40 network devices with cryptic names?

I got a fully loaded M5 at work and I don't want it. I just have a linux vm for doing work on it.

[–] calamityjanitor@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Like, why is bash ancient? (3.2 vs 5) To avoid GPLv3, zsh is the new default.

Why is there no package manager Mac App store is the official one, can also install brew, macports, pkgsrc, or nix. Or use language/runtime specific ones like npm, pip, cargo, go.

Why are the utils like ls and friends flag-order-sensitive They avoid GNU versions of utilities, for similar licencing fears as avoiding modern bash. That said ls . -lah is unhinged, I don't know any other unix derived ls that supports that.

Why do I have 40 network devices with cryptic names? Yeah they got some weirdo Apple stuff

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

None of these are good reasons for it to be like this.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

zsh is much better than bash tho

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

but it isn't available anywhere else so I can't use it for scripts that get distributed.

[–] calamityjanitor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If your script starts with #!/bin/bash, both bash and zsh will run it fine. The bigger problem is the programs, filesystem and libraries being different. Which is why POSIX exists, if you're looking to write stuff that works across systems.

I couldn't tell if you were honestly asking for explanations or if all of your complaints sum up to "it's different and I don't like that". Which honestly, fair.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

not exactly. if you're worried about the differences between bash 3 and 5, you're probably using some intermediate bash-exclusive features because that's the headlining changes between these versions (google says associative arrays and new shellvars. even if zsh has equivalent features, the syntax would be different.) it's only "guaranteed" to run fine in both shells if the shebang ends in /sh to call the POSIX shell without any bash- or zsh- specific features.

it isn’t available anywhere else

i don't get what @greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo means by this though

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 1 points 1 week ago

bash 3.2 means that no, it wont run.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

brew doesn't count, just as npm doesn't count as a legitimate package manager

brew isn’t like npm at all though?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today -1 points 2 weeks ago

even if not the neo, for college, they will just pay for the one that can do all those things. windows is too unfamiliar for most people.