this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
821 points (98.5% liked)

Privacy

9684 readers
1211 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I still say fuck them and push back and that total control is there end goal.

However. I agree with what they're putting in place at this time. It's a one time 24 hour hold before you can install apks from unknown places.

Unfortunately, a lot of people are pieces of shit, and I know for pretty much a fact that making this move will prevent old people from getting scammed. Especially for more targeted attacks where you can use ai to fake one of their relatives voices. It pumps a brake on scammers getting people to grant access while under a panic.

So if you're tech savvy, you'll just have to wait an extra 24 hours before you can start side loading after a phone reset or new phone purchase. Not a big deal if it keeps my pops from having his bank account drained. The guy got in a panic when his Facebook billiards game lost his score data. The guy would have left his phone with someone for a week if they told him they could have gotten it back.

[–] Vocalize8711@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Security should not control us, we should control security. In other words, this is not the right solution.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 8 hours ago

There's a middle ground between complete disregard and complete lockdown. If you've got a better solution to scammers that isn't going to drain your battery, invade your privacy, or hog up resources, I'm all ears. Grow up a little and maybe stop being so "me" centric.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 10 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

This is clearly not designed to keep people secure. If it was, Google would not force you to make your device less secure to install apps of your choice.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 9 hours ago

Lol at what you call "proof". Also, no one said you had to leave it enabled. Also, also, dev options is a security risk BECAUSE it allows for side loading. Hahaha

[–] pfried@reddthat.com 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The only way it reduces security is by increasing the attack surface. There is no "now anybody can get root on your phone" vulnerability for enabling developer options, and if there were, Google would patch it. I always enable developer options as soon as I get a new device.

Because of this, the audit described in the more link is deprecated.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago

I always enable developer options as soon as I get a new device.

That's great for you, but you and I are not the targets that Google is supposedly trying to protect from supposed scams.