this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
106 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29607 readers
2095 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Americans can’t afford the higher health insurance premiums that resulted from Congress’s refusal to extend federal tax credits.

Somehow, there's always plenty of money for levying war, whether against Americans or others, as well as plenty of room to cut billionaires taxes. Just not enough for regular folks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (2 children)

We need to end insurance in the US. Single payer healthcare entirely covered by taxes for necessary treatments. Very small copays at most and no stupid deductibles.

That being said... I did a double take to this:

Megan Burkett, 49, a nurse practitioner in Arroyo Grande, Calif., dropped coverage for herself, her husband and her son in the face of escalating costs. She is working three part-time jobs, none of which offer health insurance. Her husband, a contractor, is self-employed and also does not have coverage from work. When she went to sign up for A.C.A. coverage for this year, she found the policy for her family would cost roughly $2,500 a month, in line with her mortgage payment. That contrasts with the $307 a month she paid when she qualified for a federal subsidy last year.

“On paper, I have a really good job and salary,” Ms. Burkett said. “I can’t afford a second mortgage every month.”

NPs there make about 150k. Her husband is a construction contractor. These two have to make close to 300k (and absolutely well above 200k) and can absolutely afford a 5000/mo monthly nut between a 2500 mortgage and a 2500 health insurance plan.

Saying she works "three part time jobs" means she is per diem at three facilities. Those workers make even more than internal salaried ones typically.

Even if they pay 50% taxes, more than anybody in the entire country, their take home pay should be about 150k. 5000*12=60,000. You're telling me you can't live on 90k post tax (7,500/month) after housing costs? get real. Your husband is expected to drop about 15,000 per person on insurance as a business owner with business money. You're choosing to be hourly contractor as an NP instead of internal that gets paid less. Nurses of all kinds have crazy shortages all over the country, tons retired after covid and staffing levels still haven't caught up.

Just such a horrible example. There has to be better ones.

We need to eliminate the health insurance industry in this country, drug ads, and negotiate pricing with pharma companies about drug pricing like every other civilized country does. Single payer healthcare is the way.. and selling people on this shit isn't talking about high paying upper middle class families as the sob story isn't going to do it.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You're not taking into account how people budget.

Child care and car payments are also huge chunks of a family's expense. They make too much for child care subsidies and contracting means a truck payment.

They real issue is the need to absorb a $2200 per month increase in their existing budget with little notice. Their actually budget not some random internet strangers ideal budget.

Also that's $26k a year just for health in. They are better off rolling the dice and paying out of pocket at cash discount prices.

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 0 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

93rd percentile of income in a household like that. So solidly into the top 10% of earners in the US.

Given that Megan is 49, their kid is pretty much guaranteed to not be in daycare.

Almost everybody needs a vehicle for work in the US. A work truck may cost a little bit more than a budget car but the numbers just don't add up. If his business is making so little that the truck payment is putting them under, they have other, bigger problems with the business.

I wouldn't want to risk being without health insurance around 50 though. 26k is like one incident causing a couple nights stay in a hospital.

all this being said... I know how to budget. I'm not a kid. I have a mortgage and all kinds of other things going on and I know healthcare costs... my wife maxes out her deductible well before April every single year. These people are not the norm, even if it may be a 'normal' income to people like us. They don't need the subsidy anywhere near as bad as the other 90%

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 20 hours ago

The people at the bottom aren't interacting with NYT reporters at a Nazi bar