this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
350 points (99.4% liked)
Work Reform
16203 readers
486 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It would be true. Except this only works in a genuinely free market. We've not had a really free market for a long time now. The people at the top are just not competing as would be required to make an open and free market work.
Which seems to be an inevitability, unless state power is used to force the people at the top to play by the rules. But don't most liberals consider that authoritarianism? It seems to me whenever something like that is mentioned, there is much hand wringing and clutching of pearls at the thought of such big government overreach.
It is, but when people talk about a free market preventing this. They would be right when there's genuine competition. However at some point, there's always going to be a better upside for those at the top to collaborate, in order to share the far far more cash they can extract from everyone below them when they do.
It's just, it's no longer fashionable to put on a face of decency. They're full mask off now.
Yes, the mask is fully off. So, again, won't state power be needed to reign these people in?
So. Ultimately, yes. But I think their hold on politicians all over the west has not loosened yet. But governments will need to do something at some point. Not least because if AI and robotics continues to remove the number of available roles humans are required for, and the number of humans needed for the roles that do remain we'll reach a point where not enough tax is being paid. But in any case there is a definite feeling that while those that were middle class and above were safe until now, I would argue they're targeting everyone who isn't in the 1% now to try to siphon more upwards so that they can become the 0.1%.
Recall that the only trickle down economics that exists is the tax system. Those with money don't pay tax. But they do pay the employees that pay taxes. Pretty much all the taxes. There will be a critical point where there will be too many people unemployed, or just not paid enough to be covering the cost of the benefits systems, especially those over here in Europe etc. It should be no surprise why those on the right that are seeking power and are backed by those with money, are also wanting to shut things down like the social healthcare system here in the UK as an example. Eventually these will collapse if things continue how they are.
Governments will need to collect money from those people they've always been happy to give a free ride. Either that, or there will be a revolution. Again, no surprise the richest people are building bunkers/otherwise finding hideaways for themselves. They know the end result of their way of life.
When talking about this, I generally say we've not hit the bottom yet. We've not reached the worst this will get yet. We have some way to go and things are likely to get pretty bad.
So in summary, yes it will be needed. Don't hold your breath for seeing anything like that kind of action any time soon. It'll take a lot more visible depravity before they're forced to act.
A genuinely free market would be even worse. We do have various protections in the US. If we had zero, companies would be dumping waste and giving everyone super-cancer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swill_milk_scandal
I had a conversation with a coworker a while ago where he was like, "Well I just wouldn't buy the swill milk."
I was like, "How would you know??
The utter hubris of that kind of person thinking they're going to like spin up a whole chemistry lab to check the quality of everything they buy. The insanity of thinking that's a good world to envision.
Citation needed.
I'm not writing a wikipedia article here[1]. Just writing a comment on what is just an internet forum.
[1] https://kbin.life/m/workreform@lemmy.world/t/588402/CEO-pay-soared-in-2025-20-times-faster-than-workers/comment/7663743#entry-comment-7663743 "just a comment" posted to kbin.life, part of the threadiverse.
I'm calling bullshit on any idea suggesting there was more than 30 seconds of a "really free market" at some point in any modern countries history that could qualify the "we"
Right. I mean I don't know how far back we'd need to go to find a truly free market, possibly before we have the concept of money. I think fair is also too subjective for me to give any real definitive article for too.