this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
79 points (98.8% liked)
Slop.
847 readers
498 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
classic liberal argument, creating a false dichotomy while admitting that they are completely fine with killing palestinians personally.
while i'm not comfortable to say that the theoretical model of FPTP strategic voting is completely false, for the love of god stop trying to reduce decades of politics into re-occurring singular "never to be repeated" moments of choosing between only two candidates that belong on a single dimension of good/bad and you just have to vote for someone that is closest to the good part.
even ignoring the game theory of it at all, i just can't fathom why do people not understand that when you make your vote a guarantee for a party, the only logical choice for that party is to ignore you and pivot to the population that might not vote for them. getting the "lesser evil" now simply makes the next election be between evil and greater evil.
The fact that Palestinians are on both sides of the track is also the admission from liberals that Palestinians are a lost cause that everyone needs to accept. That there are no alternatives they can think of and Gaza needs to die.....
YES. I was gonna comment that, libs simply don't see Palestinians as people. It's beyond fucked up.