politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Is this idiot trying to lose the midterms?
I suspect the answer is actually "yes". AIPAC has spoken, they like trump.
Controlled opposition. Like Chuck the cuck or rich bitch Pelosi
Sounds like he's trying to win the midterms.
Sure, drive down the cost of living ... by impeaching Trump and getting rid of his dumbass tariffs.
Impeaching Trump will not remove him and is political theater since there is no way they will have 67 senate votes. It should be done anyway as a matter of principle, but should not be a top priority.
They somehow found the Senate votes for making the Epstein files release into law. (A law which the regime is now blatantly and unapologetically violating.)
What would have happened there if House Dems just sat on their thumbs and said, "There is no way we will have the votes in the Senate for this"?
The Dems have got to stop assuming defeat before they even try.
It's also not beneficial to waste political capital on extreme long shots. Impeach as a matter of principal, but don't make it a primary focus.
I kind of take objection to the entire concept of 'political capital', spoken of as if it's an exchange currency that gets used up and permanently goes away when you spend it. It stinks of corrupt and opaque backroom deals and quid pro quo. And, as is the case here, it creates and justifies self-defeating attitudes, where politicians very often don't dare to do the right thing, because they can't risk 'spending' their precious 'political capital' on the right thing when they're saving it up for something else they might possibly need it for later. How many politicians have ended their terms with 'political capital' still left unspent in their account? That shit has an expiration date -- it makes no sense to hoard it!
Instead, just do the right thing (to the best of your ability to determine what the 'right thing' is) immediately and unrelentingly, at every turn. Never hold back.
And I also only ever hear it as an explanation of why Dems "can't" do the right thing. When have you ever heard Republicans talking about how they can't do something because they 'don't have the political capital'? No, they just do it. And if their bill/resolution/whatever fails to pass, they just do it again. And again. How many times did they try to repeal the Affordable Care Act? They obviously didn't have the 'political capital' to pull that off, but it didn't stop them from trying over and over again anyway. Why can't the Dems have a bit of that energy when it comes to doing things that might benefit the country? (I know, trick question. The real reason they can't do that is because they're bought and paid for by corporate interests. 'Political capital' is just another convenient excuse they trot out in the all-too-frequent case of when the interests of their donors aren't aligned with the interests of their voters.)
Sounds like you don't understand where we're at as a nation.
Or what Americans actually want. it's not a "vocal minority" that want the pedophile, racist, bigoted asshole of a president that is jacking up our cost of living so he can be a fucking king gone. So ignoring that and saying you will do nothing about it IS NOT A WINNING STRATEGY.
doing nothing except writing stern letters is not going to solve the problem, either.
How did Trump win? The economy.
that's excessively simplistic.
Trump did not win "because of the economy."
He won because he was able to motivate his base to vote where Harris had been less able to do so.
Yes, Trump utilized "the economy" as a talking point, but he also utilized deregulation, and immigration (read: general bigotry and scapegoating) as well as LGBTQ+ and christofascist culture war bullshit. Trump's voters are too stupid to understand that he's lying to them, so that kind of messaging actually works.
Harris on the other hand also campaigned on "the economy"- and the cost of living and continued work to supporting not-millionaires; as well as shit like Trump's former immigration plan and continued support for Israel and so on. harris/Democrat voters are not too stupid to see the problem with some of the things she adopted(immigration, supporting israel) and such like; while souring on economic messaging because Biden had been constantly running that out as if it were amazing while most Americans were struggling. (it took him until like the October before the presidential election to even acknowledge most Americans were still struggling.)
Basically, Trump won because Harris did exactly what the Jefferies is now doing; and that's summed up as "Ignoring the American people".
Is there some way both parties can lose the midterms?
If enough people vote for a different party.
Hypothetically, yes, independents could have a majority. Realistically… no.
I really hope he gets primaried
I'm hoping there plan is to treat him like a stupid old feeb, and they're saying this with a big wink.