this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
564 points (99.1% liked)

World News

56136 readers
2413 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You would get banned for doing Russian propaganda and claim criticism of Ukraine do not make you a russian propagandist

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would hope if I repeated any Russian propaganda I would get called out on it. Then a discussion could take place on what we know and what is probably fabricated. And there is a place for valid criticism of Ukrane policies I'm sure - blind agreement with any side is ignorant. Obvious there's a shit ton more of a place for criticism of Russian policies. And context matters. But banning people just because they don't agree with the exact narrow narrative of a mod is counter productive. Obviously if someone is just blindly repeating garbage noise or is offensive then a ban has its place. But we've got to take care not to ruin Lemmy by banning everything that's not 100% in agreement with the hive mind. That leads to vacuous discourse

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No context justify settler colonialism and genocide. Tou won't fins anything in internstional always. Defending stuffs like that are not opinions

Most russian apologists are refuting concrete evidences. Those should be banned

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes I've seen Russian apologists say stuff that is completely at odds with everything that I've seen reported. I think they're lying and spewing propaganda, but I know in war that's fairly normal and the West also spews propaganda. There's sometimes a grain of truth; sometimes it is diametrically opposite of the truth. And then it can be interesting to dig down to the root message being played. But banning discussion should be reserved only for toxic messages, not just those that you disagree with. I'm sure there are Russians who actually believe Putin is doing the right thing based on the information they've been told - isn't it good to find their sources and prove how they're lies? They probably won't admit it on the spot, but you can change minds through communication. It's at least good to try.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But banning discussion should be reserved only for toxic messages, not just those that you disagree with.

Nothing more toxic than justifying illegal wars and genocides. Again we are not talking about opinions

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've been banned while specifically saying I do not support Isreal's genocide. All it takes is saying Palestines shouldn't call for the genocide of Jews and I'd be called a hasboro, a Zionist and an Israeli appologist. People don't listen, they just see something that's not 100% supporting their extreme position and they lash out - and I understand the hate, but there certainly are reasonable opinions that don't involve revenge genocide, I would think. Banning discussion is stupid. It's like burning books in libraries that you don't agree with. Or defunding scientists because you don't like the answers that the science provides.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But I talked specifically about people justifying settler colonialism and genocide . Don't make it about yourself

Banning discussion is stupid. It’s like burning books in libraries that you don’t agree with. Or defunding scientists because you don’t like the answers that the science provides.

Wrong analogy. Banning people advocating for invading Ukraine or israel colonizing Palestine is similar to banning nazis, racists and supermasists

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But people seem to think I'm justifying genocide when I'm clearly not, I'm just agreeing with everything they say. And they ban ban ban. That is stupid, like burning books.
I 100% disagree with Russia invading Ukraine. It is horrific and stupid. But I would still be interested in talking with someone who supports it to try and understand where the hell they're coming from. If they just buy into Russian propaganda or worse are clearly spreading it on purpose then there's no useful conversation to be had, but if they genuinely believe it's the right thing to do based n something that I don't know about, I'd love to hear them out, and then presumably try to help them see where they are wrong.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Stop talking about yourself. There is settler colonialism apologists that run free on lemmy

But I would still be interested in talking with someone who supports it to try and understand where the hell they're coming from.

Once you present them facts and evidence and they still repeat lies. They should be banned. Nothing justify settler colonialism

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

I'm talking about myself because I have been banned from multiple Lemmy subs despite clearly not being one of those settler colonial apologists, but being accused of it for no reason other than I didn't just blindly agree with everything.
And yes if people lie and ignore facts you can reasonably argue to ban them (I probably wouldn't, but I understand).