Asklemmy

54356 readers

185 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

Should "soft science" be considered real science? (lemmychan.org)

submitted 4 weeks ago by torik@lemmychan.org to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

spoiler

Personally? No, absolutely not. There should be no differentiating between what can be measured, and what cannot.

I can't help but look at the reproducibility issue in "Psychology" and notice, what did they do about it? Nothing. It just exists. It's not real science.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UNY0N@feddit.org 26 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Absolutely, yes.

The scientific method is an empirical method for acquiring knowledge through careful observation, rigorous skepticism, hypothesis testing, and experimental validation.

Any observable phenomenon should be studied using the scientific method. The alternatives are superstition or ignorance.

Psychology is a good example. It has been limited by our technology and our morals. The human brain is extremely complicated, and we cannot just disrupt peoples lives to create ideal testing conditions. But that doesn't mean that psychology is not science. It just means that it has unique challenges.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Psychology could be a science, but not the way it is being done currently.

[–] UNY0N@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

By all psychologists?

I agree that there is some stupid stuff being done in the name of science, 100%. But the discipline isn't really the deciding factor imho.

If you are interested, here is sabine explaining how academic is fundamentally broken.

https://youtu.be/LKiBlGDfRU8