this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
610 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31043 readers
1700 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, I'm with you on that (like, if it were a fake attempt, wouldn't you want the shooter to not be a Republican?), but there are enough weird things around the shooting that it should give anyone pause.

The big one that I haven't seen a compelling answer for is how someone managed to get on a roof within comfortable plinking distance of a former president running for reelection and then fire multiple shots before getting dusted. "Incompetence" is the only answer we've been given, so I'm not surprised that conspiracy theorists are flocking to this.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Not to mention, the skill needed to wing his ear (or hit the glass that winged his ear) at that distance without wanting to kill him in the process, it would probably be beyond the capability of a marksman this young.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago

I honestly doubt there are more than a handful of marksmen alive who could reliably make that shot consistently enough that Trump would trust his life to them. There's no fucking way that bloody ear came from a bullet, nevermind the collateral trauma his head would have experienced if it had. The scenario I've heard that seems most plausible is that his ear scraped against an SS agent's holster as they were getting him out of the way.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Doing a shot like that reliably would be beyond the capability of any marksman.

There are, perhaps, some out there who could do it most of the time, but I don't think there's a single one ever who could count on it as a 100% thing.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Do we have numbers? Like distance etc

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

He needed to be close but not too close. That was his failure - damn near took him out on accident.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

There are millions upon millions of people in America, I have literally been in this position (well I was in my apartment) although I was a resident, it's not like they conducted a door to door sweep. Maybe if I reached my literal sniper rifle a secret service guy would've shot me, I highly doubt it though. Trump is dumb enough to go to random places like a lawn care service thinking it's a restaurant, and people let him. Tbh I haven't really looked into the issue because I don't care, but there's states where 50%+ people own guns and you don't think there's one guy mad enough to shoot him?

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I had heard it was due to a communication breakdown between the local authorities and Secret Service. It's a stunning lapse but not impossible, presidents have been assassinated and attacked before.