this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
201 points (98.6% liked)

politics

29742 readers
2731 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

They are not wrong

Trump is a completely compromised fucking joke

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Compromised, and sitting on a significant stockpile of nuclear weapons. He's also highly suggestible, inconsistent and easily provoked.

Combined with the amount of power ceded to the US executive branch since Reagan means that dumpy diaper's whims can cause significant harm before either of the other two branches can even be bothered to start thinking about stopping it.

In the end, missiles travel faster than judges, let alone congress.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Missiles will launch and two weeks later when congress is back from their break they'll write a letter asking him to stop.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

the only thing is that turmp is practically owned by putin, so I don't know how that changes things.

[–] mr_account@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To be fair, he's not owned entirely by putin. He's the live grenade that Russia, Israel, and Saudi Arabia are fighting for control over

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't forget the Silicone Valley tech-bros.

Trump is owned by whoever flattered/bribed him the most recently.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 month ago

tech ho-bros, my dude

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

The dumbest game of hot potato

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If Trump was Putin's puppet, he wouldn't TACO out of his disputes with Europe. Greenland wouldn't be in Danish hands. Hell, Putin's puppet might even want to join the war in Ukraine on Russia's side.

The only person Trump cares about is Trump. The best Putin can hope for is that Trump destroys a bunch of shit indiscriminately, which he is doing quite well. Some of the destroyed shit could be Russian assets, which Russia will have to endure.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

No one said he was a good puppet.

He listens to what Putin tells him to do, mishears most of it, misunderstands most of what's left, and in five minutes has forgotten most of what was left after that, and tries to turn whatever remains into a scam that'll benefit him.

But, inasmuch as he is able to want to do something that doesn't directly and immediately benefit him personally, he tries to be a good puppet, at least when he remembers the blackmail material the ex-KGB bastard has on him.

He's just bad at it, as he is at everything else except at avoiding paying his bills.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Compromised by the same Imperialist oligarchs that have always controlled the US? I wouldn't call it "compromised". I'd call it America as usual with some extra crazy on top.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The depth, breadth, reach,and totality is far beyond anything in the past. Screens weren't nearly pervasive. People still interacted with their social groups, they went to church, they volunteered, they read, they received news that was just that and nothing more. Facts, not editorial

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Are you talking about how the news was perceived as "fact based" in the past? If so, I agree it was definitely much more accepted that way. But, I wouldn't say it actually was.

The Internet has largely made the ability of the media, to form a universal narrative about the acts of US imperialism, much more difficult. That is why the media landscape has had to largely shift from a form of direct propaganda (forming a universal narrative for the majority of the population to believe) to a form of multiple sets of propaganda. The media today is not really lying any less than it did in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, etc. It just has to lie with multiple narratives. It's less about forming a unifying narrative than it is about making it feel like "the truth" is unattainable.

The "post truth world" is not implying that we once lived in a world of truth and facts. It's describing the shift in how people feel about the world. They use to feel comfortable in believing "the truth" about Communism. Or "the truth" about how "they hate us for our freedoms" (when we suffered the consequences of blowback on 9/11).

The media has largely gone from manufacturing consent through forming "the truth" of a single narrative to, instead, manufacturing consent through confusion. The Genocide of Palestine was "complicated" and "Israel denies".

It's why our world is filled with doomerism and apathy. We are no longer kept passive by a comforting lie that made us feel good. We are now kept passive in an uncomfortable feeling of powerlessness as we witness the crimes of our country live in 4k.

The only "comfort" we feel is that maybe things can "go back" to how they use to be. When, in reality, they were never that way to begin with. And, well, that's the hardest thing these days to get people to understand. They want to believe it's "the digital age" that caused it. They want to believe that Trump is a special evil and that once he's gone we won't be so awful.

Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, Palestine. These are not new forms of evil that the American empire is engaging in. Trump is only putting his own (very unapologetic) style onto crimes the US has been engaging in for a long time.

[–] Fishnoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago