this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
40 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

14586 readers
935 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
40
Three years after its release, Star Trek: Resurgence is about to be delisted for good (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 weeks ago

Off course I already got affected by removing ability to purchase games, I wanted to buy when they get cheap. Now I cannot anymore (at least certain games on Steam). These affect me personally. What's so hard to understand that the game in this post does not affect me personally and I do not care about this game on a personal level? I don't have to care about every game.

I am however for archival of the game to preserve it for the future (not by the company, but more like we play Roms in emulators or install old Windows games from Abandonware site). Preservation is important and I do not discriminate there. But I do not care if pseudo games sold as a game for money. I do not see a value in buying this "media" in tricking people its a game. Those who have it do not lose access anyway.