this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
88 points (98.9% liked)

Climate

8535 readers
328 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The problem is t people burning things occasionally.

The problem is single companies burning the output of a hundred thousand people on a daily basis. And cruise ships. Tankers. Oil wells. Planes. Ships. Etc

The commercial and industrial sector like to offload the burden to us to make us feel bad for leaving a light on and having a bonfire but maybe look at a coal power plant and the Las Vegas strip. Or the shipping and plane apps.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wood pellets are exactly that kind of large industrial operation, with the pellets mostly shipped to power plants

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah yes of course. I was thinking of home use pellets.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah, so long as the number of home users does not rise, they can be ok. Most of the world getting off fossil fuels can't shift to wood

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Not all ships are bad. There is a pretty cool 3 mast sailing ship around here from time to time.