Asklemmy

53927 readers

819 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

Does this explain why there are no bullet trains in the USA? (piefed.social)

submitted 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) by Shadow79@piefed.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Short answer: cities are too far apart and the USA is large. However, how much funding is there to really implement the same thing that exists in Japan but in the United States? Also, is there an incentive for that in the first place? What about population density? Japan is more compact regarding their population density while that's not the case for America plus both Osaka & Kyoto aren't too far from each other (but Miami & Washington DC are distant).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 1 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

It's less about size and more about population density.

Japan is 338 people per square kilometer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Japan

China is 147 people per square kilometer total https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China

The US is 36 people per square kilometer https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/dec/density-data-text.html

The US could build long distance high speed rail like Japan and China, but the ridership level would be rock bottom due to the low population density.

[–] Voltarion@piefed.social 3 points 13 hours ago

Do the densly populated areas should be first to be connected im the US.

[–] atan@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago

Those statistics are misleading. China's population is very unevenly distributed between the east and west, but Western China is still serviced by high-speed railway.

The 1786km Lanzhou–Urumqi HSR serves three Western Chinese provinces: Gansu (57.7 people per sq km), Qinghai (8.2) and Xinjiang (15.8).

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago

I think it would be fine to just build the stations in big cities. Nobody is demanding high speed rail across Alaska.