this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
92 points (98.9% liked)
Slop.
856 readers
384 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Taking the rest of the story at face value, what could possibly be the validity of the last paragraph? How do they know no one can say it? They know the people they "caught" couldn't say it, but that's absolutely no indication of it catching everyone. If someone did get through this, how would they know? It's like dragging a fishing net, hauling it up, pointing to the fish and saying that it catching some fish is evidence that no fish could get through.
Which is like a paragraph to say this is functionally a form of "survivorship bias."
Even if they said the stupid sentence (freeze peach land of the free btw) AND someone saw it AND they gave a shit AND they gave enough of a shit to say something then you'd say "the stupid fucking chud interviewer asked me to say it as a condition of employment". THEN they'd have to care enough to escalate it AND someone higher up would have to give a shit MORE than they care about the money that the worker could now get.
Which seems dubious to me
If those kids could think more than one step ahead they'd be quite upset