this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
44 points (83.3% liked)
Asklemmy
53927 readers
682 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We're talking about exploration. Satellites aren't exploring anything, they're basically just infrastructure.
As is depicted in the OP's picture, I'm specifically talking about sending humans to space, and additionally, using them to explore deeper into space. It's mostly pointless as anything other than a propaganda tool. Anything that can be discovered by sending humans out in space can be discovered by humans on Earth.
The space station might need humans on it to maintain it, but again, the station isn't exploring anything. We probably don't even need humans on the space station, remote maintenance and operation seems doable.