this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
259 points (98.9% liked)

Flippanarchy

2288 readers
526 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

mullvad canvas blocker ublock duck.ai if you have to

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but unless I'm the CEO of those places (and in case there was any question, I'm not) I can't do shit about it if I need to use whatever service it is. I can email all I want to, I'm not like a respected security researcher or anything I'm just some dickhead with an account.

[โ€“] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I didn't expect you to do anything about it. Was just emphasizing that 2FA is not a legitimate reason to require a phone number, that's all.

edit: I think I might have been a bit ambiguous: people who use as in "implement it into their authentication procedures" are the idiots, not the people those idiots are forcing to give up their phone number.