this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
19 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11868 readers
229 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Calgary woman who participated in a grandparent scam, stealing thousands of dollars from elderly victims, including three who were in their 90s, should get to serve her sentence at home, lawyers argued Friday.

Alana Love Duncan, 48, pleaded guilty in October to seven counts of fraud over $5,000 for crimes that took place over a four-week period in the summer of 2023.

At a sentencing hearing Friday, Duncan’s role was described by prosecutor Don Couturier as the “in-person courier” in a “sophisticated and predatory” scheme. Police have not charged the others involved in the scam.

In total, Duncan and her partners-in-crime stole $70,000 from the seven victims.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"should serve her sentence at home"

That's a big nope from me.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

So I get the desire to punish and get revenge, but each inmate costs us $319/day (2024). So jailing her would be spending 116k/yr on this degenerate, with no benefit to society.

We don't need to lock her up for our safety, we just need to heavily monitor her actions and prohibit telecommunications, which is way cheaper. I hope she has a no telecommunications order for at least a couple decades so she can never pull this scam again.

I think once you factor in how much public money we spend on these losers it's a lot easier to see the benefit of house arrest or other, cheaper punitive measures that create the same level of protection for the rest of us and our parents/grandparents.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3510001301

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago

While prison is expensive, you're not accounting that the risk of prison can be effective at disincentivizing future crimes which also have a cost to society. So yeah, confining this scammer in prison is expensive, but if it scares off others from scamming then prison could end up net beneficial.

I will add that I'm not at all against programs trying to rehabilitate criminals, especially as those programs can both help the prisoner and society (by reducing repeat crimes); but I do believe that there is value in making the punishment for crime unpleasant for the criminal, which I don't think house arrest accomplishes.