this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
44 points (83.3% liked)
Asklemmy
53927 readers
553 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Firstly, people have such a massive misconception about the cost of space exploration. It is such a miniscule part of our overall expenditure it is a drop in the ocean. (It's important now to distinguish between overall Space budgets and the exploration budgets since we spend a lot of money in space that's not for scientific development nowadays).
The Artemis program for example was 93 billion over 13 years, ~7 billion per year (2012-2025).
The Iraq war cost ~5 trillion over 8 years. Or 625 billion per year.
The entire Artemis program could have been funded by winding down the Iraq war a couple of months earlier.
The annual cost of the NHS is 275 billion per year.
The extra knowledge, research and development in everything from materials, human biology, life support systems, to just engineering management improvements yield absolutely massive benefits to life on earth, greatly outweighing the alternative.
Not to mention inspiring people to enter STEM, especially girls who are still hugely underrepresented. Which has incredible benefits. Hell, even just making people excited about science and technology instead of so distrustful of it is so so important and intangible.
Even if you extend the budgets to the entire space industry, it's still a drop in the ocean, and most of the space industry budgets go directly to economic or defence benefits. Supply chain resilience, climate change policing, communications services, wildfire detection, industrial efficiency gains (e.g. data driven farming). As well as existential threats from space like solar storms and asteroids (although that's an admittedly tiny portion of funding).
This is coming from a space engineer and senior manager who has mostly fallen out of love with the industry because it is leaning towards profit focus instead of benefit focus. But it's still one of the best bang for buck industries that exists.
This is the non-linear aspect of research, where discoveries and improvements in one field may prove useful for other fields as well. Not all research pays off, but you can't predict what will and won't, so the "duds" that end up going nowhere are just part of the cost for the bangers that change the world. And who knows, maybe one of those duds may end up going off much later still!
More brains and perspectives examining a given problem increases the chances for useful solutions. Getting women into STEM isn't a diversity measure for diversity's sake, but an enrichment of the mental resource pool.
Now there's a chorus I've heard a hundred times...
Agree completely!
And yeah, VCs doing VC things has really made it a tough industry to be in lately ๐ญ I miss the early days of new space when we were just a bunch of nerds trying to make the space industry more effective at making the world a better place.
Edit: don't get me wrong, a lot of VCs are great, and have done wonders for the industry. I've had the pleasure of working with a few of them. However, the explosion of a new industry has attracted a bunch who just see a market for a market's sake.