this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
65 points (95.8% liked)
Linux
13228 readers
200 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Linux looking at Mac users being impressed with 8 years of software support.
Ha that’s cute.
Well how you gonna buy a new Mac if you could get security patches for your old device
You telling me I can install Bazzite on a 486?
Your typical Arch install? Steam OS? Ubuntu?
Idk what you consider "typical" but like...
https://gist.github.com/wjlafrance/b0d87fab147abc91804e92296f2e3ccf
Exactly! Just because there is support for a stone age CPU in the Linux Kernel, doesn't mean every single modern Linux compatible software is running smoothly on this.
Of course, from the Mac/Windows point of view it was the correct thing to ditch such old stuff. Because they are concerned about having a stable product that is running on modern hardware. Keeping this old stuff in, makes it more complicated to maintain their system and therefore more suspectable to errors.
Linux could only keep this support up for so long, because somewhere there where people that though it would be worth care about for 28 years. And even now it's not over. You can modify the kernel and patch 486 support back in again on your own. So "incomparability" doesn't really exist with a open system. It's just that nobody at the core kernel team will do this service for you anymore.
Android Linux you say?