this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
311 points (98.4% liked)

News

37103 readers
972 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Late Tuesday afternoon, with the subtlety of a wrecking ball and the morality of a foreclosure notice, the Trump administration announced the most devastating attack on the U.S. Forest Service in the agency’s 121-year history. Not a budget cut. Not a policy shift. Not a “reorganization.” An execution.

They’re ripping the headquarters out of Washington and shipping it to Salt Lake City, Utah — the beating heart of the anti-public-lands movement in America. They’re shuttering every single one of the ten regional offices that have governed this agency since Gifford Pinchot built the system over a century ago — and with them, the career professionals who spent entire lifetimes earning the expertise and the authority to push back when politicians came calling with bad ideas and worse motives. They’re destroying more than fifty research facilities across thirty-one states, labs that house decades of irreplaceable long-term science, the kind you literally cannot restart once it’s gone. And they’re replacing all of it — the offices, the scientists, the institutional knowledge, the professional independence — with fifteen political appointees called “state directors,” embedded in state capitals alongside the very governors, legislators, and industry lobbyists who have spent their careers demanding that the Forest Service log more, protect less, and get out of the way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Think there's just more non-voters than this mythically influential "protest voter" everyone keeps talking about. How about we focus on mandatory voting laws and anti-gerrymandering instead of falling for psyops talking points?

You're really telling me 89 million people "protested" by staying at home, when Kamala lost by 0.96% of the eligible voting population? Or did these people just not care to even show up no matter what?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Sounds like you're looking to find who's responsible. I'm interested in informing protest-non-voters what they voted for.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's nice, but that doesn't help us prevent our current predicament, or stop the alienation of disenfranchised voters in the future. Hispanics by and large also voted for Trump, and those were not "protest votes". That does not mean they deserve the inhumane treatment ICE is perpetuating towards them.

There are 89 million untapped voters, Democrats should be salivating over that. Instead they are pairing with the Cheneys and moving farther right.

Harris broke fundraising records with her candidacy with 64% of those donations being first time donors. They actually could have had the momentum to mobilize non-voters. Instead they capitulated to corporate interests as usual.

Again, the problem isn't "protest voters", they are such a small percentage. People focusing on this are ignoring a lot of other factors, and honestly it seems like another way to scapegoat a DNC systemic problem.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

See, you're looking for "the problem". I'm informing protest-non-voters what they voted for. Ciao.

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com -1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is what you voted for liberals.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure liberals largely voted correctly actually

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Perpetuating a cycle of weak, corporate candidates that allowed for the Republicans to get to this point is not correct, actually.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If someone voted for Dems, this isn't what they voted for.

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Perpetuating a cycle of weak, corporate candidates that just allowed the Republicans to get stronger and stronger? Yeah mate, you did.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lol funny how you try to turn voting into not voting, and not voting into ... something else. Anyways, see article and remember, this is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

I didn't say anything about non-voters, nor did I equate voting with not voting. Funny how you just make shit up.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Um, technically, this is what they not voted for. Also, with the electoral college most who "protest voted" lived in heavy blue areas. The election went for the republicans because Kamala refused to distance herself from Joe Biden and also massive campaigns of vote suppression.

But yeah, argue with other leftists, it's not like a fragmented left is the reason fascists keep winning or anything.

Edit: Seems like a lot of people on here don't know how the electoral college works and also want to feel smug about how they voted. Typical. I'll say it for the people in the back. We need all fucking hands on deck right now as our government is currently descending further into fascism. The last election doesn't matter. Register to vote. Organize with your neighbors to protect your local polling places. Donate time or money to local mutual aid. If you don't know where or how you can start at either link below.

https://www.fiftyfifty.one/organizer-resources

https://southerncoalition.org/resources/rapid-response-101/

Most importantly don't be a smug asshole and instead think "What would I have done in 1933 Nazi Germany." We need all the help we can get.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They aren't leftists. -They're advocating for the old neoliberal candidate which was/is center-right

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Also leftists are anti-genocide.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Also sounds like you're looking to blame. I am looking to inform protest-non-voters what they voted for. And yes this is what they voted for.