this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
61 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55397 readers
2472 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has again attacked Nato for not supporting the US in the Iran war, following a private meeting with its Secretary General Mark Rutte at the White House.

In a post shared to Truth Social after the meeting, the US President said: "NATO WASN'T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON'T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN."

Meanwhile, Rutte has described his meeting to CNN with Trump as "very frank" and "very open", despite clear disagreements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno... What worries me is that Putin's ability to escalate is constrained right now, because Ukraine is seen more as military adventurism, not a fight for survival. If he could engineer a war with NATO - especially NATO minus the US - that would justify far reaching conscription, total militarization of the economy, etc, etc. He probably won't win, but if he's fearful enough of losing power it might seem like an attractive option.

I'm not considering this a likely scenario, just one that's plausible enough that we need to plan for it.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Russia already has total militarization of the economy. Its why Russia has an economy.

I feel sometimes you people fail to understand what it's like living in a sanctioned nation.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Russia isn't even close to total militarization. Not yet. Their economy is becoming highly militarized, and you're right that that's how they've been surviving the sanctions, but their focus is still on keeping the more affluent Russians in the cities supplied with fast food, electronics and gas. They're trying to make life seem normal despite the strain of the war. Being able to dispense with those niceties would open up a lot more room for applying their industrial capacity.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

Hard disagree. 'Normal' as you describe hasn't existed for even wealthy Russians in the country since the first round of sanctions in 2014.

It's been a decade since they've been reliant on external sources for trivialities, and their economy since the union fell has been nearly exclusively oil, gas, and military hardware anyway.

It's why sanctions have largely not worked; they were given no time to actually become lazy westerners despite the west's best's efforts; so the average day to day is no different now than it was 30 years ago. For some people it's no different now than it was in the 1980s, except their rent is higher since there's no state protections.