this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
600 points (99.5% liked)

Flippanarchy

2281 readers
1086 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Using the past to make an informed decision on how to proceed is not making dubious claims about the future. The only one making dubious claims about the future is you. Please explain to me how disolving the state would somehow make vigilante justice more effective, considering that vigilante justice is already outside the purview of the state?

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I never said vigilante justice would be more effective. you're arguing with a strawman.

[–] DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

You very clearly advocated for vigilante justice and then doubled down when u/village604 said that history shows its objectively worse. You're splitting hairs and I'm blocking your disingenuous ass now.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

I’m blocking your disingenuous ass now.

oh thank God