this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
76 points (94.2% liked)

askchapo

23271 readers
58 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I see this moon launch as an exorbitantly wasteful, nationalist project. No money for healthcare and housing, but plenty of money to boldly go where man has gone several many times before.

When I bring this up with liberal friends and family, they give me a sort of incredulous look and talk about how wonderful and scientific and non-political it is. I don't mind being the "you've gone too far left" guy, but you talk to the same people about military spending and they're right on board.

Is someone here able to diagnose my crankiness and explain why this is actually a good use of resources? (Will also accept echo-chamber validation and ways to use this to increase class consciousness, if offered.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Human exploration predates imperialism by millennia, the two are not the same

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The quote above is not talking about prehistoric nomads though. He's invoking European exploration which is inseparable from colonization.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not seeing anything in the quote to justify your interpetation

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's the talk about increases in productive capacity that gives it away. It's the same framing that people used to justify Western conquest for hundreds of years.

Every time humanity stretches itself and turns a new corner, it receives a jolt of productive vitality that can carry it for centuries.

"Every time humanity stretches itself and turns a new corner, it receives a jolt of productive vitality that can carry it for centuries."

It's more of a stretch to pretend this is about ancient nomads than the most recent centuries of Western "exploration." It's possible for Sagan to be both a cool guy that everyone loves because they saw Cosmos and it blew their minds and for him to have Western brainworms.

Cosmos Episode 6 does it too:

https://vimeo.com/291415990

Idk why people are finding this some kind of hot take that can't be true. The dude romanticized conquest as part of the human spirit.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm still not seeing it, as far as I can tell your entire argument is based on the usage of the word "productive", productivity as a concept is not exclusive to capitalism and the usage of the word in this context does nothing to imply it

[–] thefunkycomitatus@hexbear.net 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My claim that Carl Sagan conflates European exploration with human nature is supported by Carl Sagan saying he conflates European with the human endeavor of exploration and then claims that exploration is human nature. If you don't see it then you don't see it.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Anything's possible when you make shit up! Unfortunately for you anyone familiar with Sagan's work will already know just how much he wrote specifically about early human history and the origins and development of our species. In the context of the quote alone it's at least slightly arguable, in the context of his actual life and career it's extremely obvious that he is referring to early human migrations and not imperialism. You clearly don't have a clue what you're talking about, so just stop talking.