this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
32 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

42671 readers
362 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
32
Inside Project Nova, Firefox's biggest redesign in years (www.pcworld.com)
submitted 21 hours ago by lostwonder@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dojan@pawb.social 42 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

“Definitely, the idea of extensions and just customizations in general is: can you create more of like a natural language interface that lets people do everything they want?”

What?

“There’s really no reason for anyone to say, ‘This is your browser; you can do whatever you want,'” Varma added.

What??

Are they drunk, or is my reading comprehension failing? I don't understand these sentences.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 32 points 20 hours ago

Those quotes are nearly incomprehensible and they aren't isolated incidents either. This CEO talks like every tech CEO selling AI products.

When you look at the term browser, it’s very antiquated in the sense that there’s static content, and when I click on the content, I get to the next link... With apps, it became more bidirectional. There’s more rich engagement with AI.

Instead of being a browser, it’s becoming a generative system, but it’s not doing it in a negative way that prevents the person’s incentive from creating the content in the first place.

CEO sure did say a thing. But it's [the interviewer's job to say please explain what you mean" in response.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 20 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

can you create more of like a natural language interface that lets people do everything they want?

I don't want a 'natural language interface' in my browser.

I want a browser interface in my browser.

This shit ain't broke. Don't fix it.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 8 points 19 hours ago

Based on the rest I think they don't mean actual natural language interface, but having enough personalisation options to setup the UI in a way that's natural for your workflow. They are just speaking 2026-corporatise instead of English.

The full sentence is:

“Definitely, the idea of extensions and just customizations in general is: can you create more of like a natural language interface that lets people do everything they want?” Varma added. “For example, we announced an update that we’re doing to our design, which is called Project Nova. And a lot of people didn’t like the rounded corners modernization. Now, we can let people pick how round they want their corners. People care, so we put it in the settings.”

They also mention some misguided "AI" features, but not in this part.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 14 hours ago

It's a direct follow-up on a question about if you can create widgets on your home-page. At least I think that's the interviewer asking a question, it could be a weird Trump-like ramble from the CEO as well.

I didn't like the previous CEO, particularly given her connections to Airbnb, but this one is undeniably worse.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

You have to remember that when Mozilla first formed the goal was to create a mini-OS in the browser with apps and the whole caboodle. With that they then wanted TO DOMINATE THE WORLD!!!! But their vision was tricky and taking way longer than expected, so they released Firefox as a temporary band-aid. Firefox went on to be their greatest project while the Mozilla Project burned, fell over in the swap, and was bulldozed into the sea. Over at Mozilla HQ there is still resentment that Firefox is their greatest project. They never gave up on WORLD DOMINATION. It's like the ego of Marc Andreessen haunts them like a ghost.

With AI, they see their opportunity for WORLD DOMINATION and are going for it again.