this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
360 points (98.6% liked)

Mildly Interesting

26023 readers
690 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

That one can't be real. There's more sugar than could physically fit in the coke can. Like no liquid, just sugar, there's more than 12oz of sugar.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

There’s 39 grams of sugar in a a coke can. Sugar is water soluble and 90% of the can is water that can absorb the 10% of sugar.

[–] hereiamagain@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 59 minutes ago)

Hmmm, look at the labels. They each say something something "100".

Not the right language, but maybe something like per 100? Like per 100 grams of water? Or.. something about volume?

IDK, it would be a weird way to do it. But something like that might explain why so much sugar, seemingly more than can fit in the can.

Sugar is heavy, there's no way 39 grams is the same size as the can

Edit: gandalf seems to have the right idea here! https://sh.itjust.works/comment/24686999

Edit2: wait, a can has 300+ grams of fluid in it... So the sugar would be 1/3 of what the whole can would be. This actually makes the picture more confusing 🤔

Edit 3:

Behold, 39 grams of sugar. About one shot glass worth.

Here's that glass next to a can. I don't have any soda pop in the house.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

whoa, the Quoakka. I didn't fact check your comment but upvoted anyway. Hopefully you aren't wrong.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 1 points 3 hours ago

I hope I'm not wrong as well! I did my best research (I googled) and looked at the nutritional labels (100% 39g of sugar).

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, even considering the angle, that seems off. I just did a search and plucked one of the first to come up; I wonder if that version has been messed with.

[–] DimFisher@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

The sugar is liquidated dude, what are you talking about? 😳