this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
28 points (100.0% liked)

Bicycle Touring and Bikepacking

1147 readers
1 users here now

For all the pedal pushers out there that love long distance cycling. There are no gear requirements and no 'minimum distances' here.

Have you ridden for a cheeky overnighter or a 3 year global trek? Doesn't matter, you're welcome here.

Have you got panniers, bikepacking bags or just a backpack with the essentials? Doesn't matter, you're welcome here.

Have you got the latest in carbon engineering or your dads old 10 speed from the 70's? Doesn't matter, you're welcome here.


Related Communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have few thoughts about bikepacking on recumbent bike.

Because of the weight distribution I don't see any difference in the ridability and handling. The issue with flexing bike when loaded with bags isn't noticeable when riding only when you need to push it.

But the hills are killing me it isn't ideal without the bags but with them it is brutal.

#bikepacking #biketouring #bikeTooter #regel17 @bicycle_touring

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

An upright bike puts the rider in much the same position as the user of a scale.

You can only put force equal to your body weight on a scale

You HAVE to be fucking trolling ๐Ÿ˜„

By your definition, the most/only effective method of riding a normal bicycle would be to simply jump up and down until you eventually reach your destination ๐Ÿ˜„

gravity limits the amount of force the upright rider can apply: any additional force doesn't go into the pedal; it goes into lifting the rider off the seat

..do you have any idea how a bicycle chain or equivalent works? Have you ever SEEN someone operate a bicycle?

I don't know if you're joking, under the influence of powerful hallucinogenic substances, or a secret fourth thing, but you're DEFINITELY not making sense regardless ๐Ÿ˜„

[โ€“] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The reason I am "not making sense" is because you are continuing to not understand the distinction between "force" and "power".

"Torque" is a measure of force. "Horsepower" is a measure of power. Do you understand the difference between the two? Until you understand that distinction, you will not be able to understand the discussion you have joined.

โ€ฆdo you have any idea how a bicycle chain or equivalent works? Have you ever SEEN someone operate a bicycle?

Yep! I've actually even ridden bicycles before! My hips have never been secured to an upright bike. Every time I've tried to press harder on the pedals than my body weight, my hips have come off the seat. The force my legs have applied to the pedals has lifted my body into the air, against the force of gravity. I've been able to introduce a little more force on the pedals, with my arms pulling my body downward toward the handlebars, but not by much.

On the recumbent bike, gravity and my arms aren't what is providing the counter force to allow me to push against the pedals. The backrest of the bike is what I am pushing against. I can push far more than my body weight against the backrest. Much more than I can pull with my arms.

You've entered a discussion on "force", but you are still failing to understand that you are talking about "power". When you understand the difference between "force" and "power", you'll be able to understand the discussion. Until then, my commentary will not make any sense to you.

[โ€“] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep! I've actually even ridden bicycles before! My hips have never been secured to an upright bike. Every time I've tried to press harder on the pedals than my body weight, my hips have come off the seat. The force my legs have applied to the pedals has lifted my body into the air, against the force of gravity. I've been able to introduce a little more force on the pedals, with my arms pulling my body downward toward the handlebars, but not by much.

You're completely forgetting the fact that you're also pulling up with your "rear" foot as you're pedalling. Moreover, pedalling is not "push down repeat on other leg", but it's a circular motion where you're able to transfer power all through the cycle.

The maximum force you're able to put to pedals is irrelevant, because so much of the power you output depends on the cadence. If you're pushing your maximum force on the pedals, it already means you've lost the momentum and your power output is shit. The force has a small effect on sprints though.

Anyways, if the force was a major factor to prioritize, you'd see a lot more pro cyclists being swedish giants, but in reality most are on the shorter side. The benefits from lower weight and less drag from big body are far more important factors

[โ€“] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

See, I knew you could get there.

Now, I'm gonna have you go up to where the parent commentator discussed the importance of "force" and the use of arms on an upright bike, and reply your "power" comment to them, not me. I was directly rebutting their "force" arguments; I made no claims regarding "power" for you to rebut. Your criticism is wasted here. But, your insight would be valuable in the context of their argument.