Explain Like I'm Five

Like Operation Epstein Fubar, it's all distraction-theatre.

"See how GREAT we are??" "accomplishment", while gutting the government & bombing hospitals & universities, for sake of getting the Epstein files off of the criminals named in them.

( & getting the heat off of the "DOJ" which admitted to shredding some of them, holding-back 47k of them, etc )

( & getting the heat off the ICE quota-based-deportations regime )

etc.

Artemis is an immense waste of money.

Worse, it's got a fundamental design-flaw which means if any of its 4 main-engines "anomaly" during takeoff, then the mission's at-least destroyed, possibly killed.

Notice that with SpaceX's rockets, you can have an engine-anomaly & it'll just make the launch more-difficult?

There are sooo many engines, that each-engine's % of the work is small-enough, that the rest can carry it, if 1 fails.

With Artemis?

ANY engine which fails, & the mission's DEAD.

They engineered it to be incapable of dealing-with such statistically-inevitable failures.

That's irresponsible, in my eyes.

Falcon9 & Starship both have loads of engines, & can deal with 1-failure, properly.

Why go against sane engineering-principles?

Because the point of the thing is institutional validation, not optimal use-of-resources.

As Feynman grated against, last century, it's simply the wrong culture that's running the show.

Business-culture instead of engineering-culture, was what killed people in the shuttlecraft..

Artemis is produced by institutionality-instead-of-right-engineering, from what I can see.. & NASA's having about 1/4 of its budget gutted immediately, so .. Artemis gets funded, but NASA's real missions get discarded?

Theatre, not NASA work.

< shrug >

_ /\ _