this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
395 points (97.6% liked)

politics

29286 readers
2158 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Nixon had the decency to resign, Trump will drive us all 6ft under without any hesitation.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nixon was not decent. The difference was that a Senator (Goldwater) told Nixon point blank that he was getting impeached and the senate had the votes to convict and remove.

Like most government officials "retirement" is getting fired.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They also didn't have Faux "News", hate radio, or the Internet back then, either.

What's so fucked up is that POS of a FCC chairman just celebrated making it even worse than it already was for truth.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Fox was started precisely because the moneybags never wanted a Republican president held to account again.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure Trump would give the order to launch the nukes and kill us all in that situation.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's why he's firing the top military people. They won't follow illegal (and reprehensible) orders, so he knows they won't bomb blue states.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

absurd claim even as a die-hard cynic.

He won't nuke his top money makers, California and NY pay for half of the US military already

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump 100% does not think that way.

Man bankrupted casinos, he has failed upwards most of his life and I don't doubt he'd try some shit on CA and NY if he thought he could get away with it. It's not their economies stopping him, its knowledge he might have to face consrquences if he did something too excessive, and as his brain liquifies I find myself wondering how long before he thinks the odds are okay.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It doesn't matter how Trump thinks, the US military isn't going to nuke their own homes, don't be ridiculous

[–] TwilitSky@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have to hope the people with access would refuse to obey these illegal orders.

[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

By that point, if Americans STILL think they can vote and avoid violence then the American public really us beyond hope.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I genuinely think he's by far the most likely president in this country's history to launch ICBMs if he knows he is fucked. Which was a conclusion myself and any non-moron also came to in 2015.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

He is really old now. A good cold, covid, a peanut or even a strong fart could do him in.