this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
78 points (96.4% liked)
Slop.
832 readers
581 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At the most generous, she seems to be talking past the commenter, but that was poorly phrased on her part. There are still people who support
knowing full well they're doing a genocide, and the fact that they're doing a genocide is also the reason each day is the most popular 
will ever be
What could be a more direct response to "it's natural everyone dislikes genocidal freaks" than "I don't think it's natural" and some examples of genocidal freaks people support?
I've never watched any Contrapoints or followed her social media. I'm guessing most of the responses here (and the fact that this thread was created in the first place) stem from people who are more familiar with her and think she sucks on other grounds.
I think the argument doesn't necessarily match the conclusion. "I don't think it's natural" can be read here as "I think it's not within human nature to oppose genocide" but she argues that "The argument to human nature does not explain why people support genocide"
To me, "it's not natural" would imply the first — that there is no basis in human nature for empathy to Palestinians, etc.