Politics

11452 readers

50 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

circularfish@beehaw.org

knokelmaat@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

Republican leaders agree to advance funding deal to end DHS shutdown (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 days ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There will no doubt be shenanigans as this proposal eventually moves forward. Must be nice to get a paid two-week Easter break in a secular country.

An end to the partial shutdown of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) may be in sight, after Congress’s Republican leaders on Wednesday agreed to advance legislation that would fund most of the agency’s operations, with the exception of those involved in immigration enforcement.

The pact may conclude the longest such funding lapse in US history, which last month caused security lines to stretch for hours at some airports as employees of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), a subagency of DHS, quit their jobs or called out of work after going weeks without pay.

Wait times eased earlier this week, after Donald Trump signed an order for TSA employees to receive paychecks.

Let's just pause here and remember that Trump does not have the power to rule by diktat, but here we are. If that word looks foreign, change the "k" to a "c," and ... er, it looks awfully familiar.

In a joint statement, Mike Johnson, House speaker, and John Thune, Senate majority leader, said they would move to pass a measure, approved by the Senate unanimously last week, which would fund DHS while excluding money for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and parts of Customs and Border Protection.

They would also abandon an attempt pushed by House Republicans to fund all of the DHS for 60 days, which Senate Democrats vowed to block with a filibuster.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

They're literally keeping Immigration without funding but getting airports up and running again. What exactly are you hardlining against? The concept of plane travel?

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They caved and managed to get none of the reforms at ICE that they've spent weeks trying to be vocal about.

No judicial warrants, no body cams, no justice for two murdered Americans. Its wild that they've done this twice - here, and with the ACA subsidies.

I dont understand why they bother to fight if they're not even going to take the hit and take a base.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 7 points 4 days ago

I would rather they got no funding rather than their promises in exchange for conditional funding and cameras.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

ICE already has funding. So the only thing not getting funding is ACTUAL immigration employees. I’m pretty sure Republicans are fine with that.

Funding is the only leverage Democrats have over the executive at this point to get them to honor the law as it stands and NOT shove a bunch of fascist changes into the new omnibus funding bill. They’ve now effectively lost that leverage, so now it’s just a case of the Republicans waiting until something happens that forces the Democrats to approve the big bill in order to not tank in the elections.