this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
92 points (96.9% liked)

politics

29322 readers
1564 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The state and more than 20 others restrict therapists from trying to change the gender identity or sexual orientation of L.G.B.T.Q. clients under the age of 18.

Needless to say, this will seriously scar a whole lot of kids whose homophobic parents force them through this

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This lawsuit was brought by a licensed psychotherapist who also happens to be a Christian. There are already restrictions on who can practice psychotherapy. These aren’t some unlicensed people. These are the people you are talking about, with a graduate school education and a licensing process and everything.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Probably someone with a masters in social work. Counselor.

I'll look into this more.

PhDs are a bit harder to get compared to masters or PsyD. PsyDs are easier as it's pay-to-get type of degree whereas a PhD is more competitive and requires research experience and a dissertation. So you have to be a research scientist to get a PhD. Not true for PsyD. Some of those people barely understand how to understand research papers or stats. They don't get training in methods or statistics so they don't know how to understand research. Nor understand human biased and why we must use scientific method because we can't trust our own opinion.

There are Christian colleges and universities but they often do not have accredited psychology degrees. They have to have their curriculum be at certain standards set by the american psychology association (apa) to qualify.

However. You can still get a counseling license even if the university you attended is not apa accredited.

Counseling licenses are given by the state.

I think this should not be allowed. But it is.

Yeah there are way too many unqualified mental health practitioners out there.

There is research on outcomes of patients based on the education type and level of therapist.

Those with masters have poorest outcomes and psyD follow. Both of these often do not use "evidence based therapies" but make up their own approaches based on their own beliefs.

As you can imagine that's not great.

Since PhD psychologist are trained scientist, it's probably not surprising they rely more on evidence based approaches.

[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t think making people get PhDs in order to be a therapist is a solution here.

I’m a Licensed Clinical Social Worker and a therapist. I already had to go through 2 years of grad school plus a little over 3,000 hours of supervised work before receiving my license (I also did an additional 2-year post-grad program in marriage and family therapy).

Acting like that doesn’t make me qualified to provide therapy is frankly bullshit and elitist.

LCSWs are the largest group providing behavioral health services in the Unted States, at 60% (Page 7 - https://socialwork.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/TX-SW-Workforce-Report24.pdf). Suggesting that every single therapist should be a PhD would result in a very swift and decisive mental health crisis in the country because not everyone can afford to take years off making income to get another degree.

Wouldn’t it be nice if every doctor did a psychiatry residency and a cardiology residency and a surgical residency… you know, so that they can be the best doctor and provide the best services? And don’t get me started on PAs!

Shouldn’t all nurses be RNAs then? Why have CNAs and such?

I am sure you see my point.

It is absolutely true that there are bad master’s-level clinicians out there (case in point, see the therapist who brought this suit). There are also bad PhDs out there. Your degree does not determine how good of a therapist you are.

The solution is to do a much better job with state regulations and laws, which will only take you so far… once again, case in point. Colorado tried to do the right thing only to have the Supreme Court shut them down.

Your entire argument is summed up and rebutted here, if you care to read: https://www.psichi.org/page/042EyeWin00bActkinso

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well I ment have these higher regulations specifically for conversion therapy as a way to make it near impossible for anyone to do it.

I suggested that to get license for conversion therapy you must have supervised training by someone with a conversion therapy license. Of which this would be a closed system. As no one can have a license without someone else having it first to train them. Maybe that wasn't clear in my proposal.

Conservatives push laws like this all the time that basically make it so no exceptions can meet the qualifications for the exceptions.

Why not do the same ?

And yeah there are great therapist with masters and terrible ones with PhDs. I only referred to statistics.

Statistically, PhD are more likely to use evidence based therapies like CBT and have better patient outcomes.

But CBT can be given by a master's holder.

I've definitely met people with masters doing therapy who are much more informed and scientific minded than some PhDs Ive met.

[–] greygore@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Kaley Chiles has a Master’s degree in Clinical Mental Health Counseling, and is a Licensed Professional Counselor and Licensed Addiction Counselor in Colorado.

A bunch of places had that information but not the actual college(s) she earned her degrees at. Her LinkedIn has her education, but I don’t want to log in to view it. I did see the logos and they confirm this information that I eventually tracked down:

Denver Seminary, Master of Arts, Clinical Mental Health, 2014

Dallas Baptist University, Bachelor of Arts, Biblical Studied and Psychology, 2012

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Okay thank you for tracking that down. So it was a Christian university where they got their clinical degree.

That tracks.

It's not apa accredited. It's "accredited" by cacrep.

Cacrep mostly does accreditation for counseling programs.

Apa for PhD and PsyD.

It's unclear what their requirements are other than "meets state guidelines".

But it appears to be a standard accreditation in the U.S.

https://denverseminary.edu/program/master-of-arts-in-counseling-licensure/clinical-mental-health/

"Accredited" by

https://www.cacrep.org/