Well that's twice as much as you've suggested. All organizing starts by bringing people together. Meeting like minded individuals and building out a core network. It takes time to build communication and supply lines for more aggressive action. So far the only thing you've got to offer is excuses and cute nicknames like idiot orange. That milling around carrying signs is where you take stock of assets you can leverage and people willing to act. When you're done wallowing in self pity, you can come step up and find the people that have been building the infrastructure we're going to need to do something meaningful. Or just sit it out and let someone else do it for you, while pretending doing nothing gives you the moral high ground.

[–] tastemyglaive@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

All you have are cheap deflections & playground insults to cover up the total absence of a strategy with big words.

That milling around carrying signs is where you take stock of aϟϟets you can leverage and people willing to aKKKt.

AKKKt how? In what way? With which organiϟϟations? To aKKKomplish what? So far the only thing these "people" agree on is Orange Man Bad. You poor saps have had the same president for many years. Meet Mister Quantitative Easing. He's been around for Some Time Now. Do I need to hyperlink you to earlier in the converϟϟation where you ignored my structural criticism of these groups?

The same air force murdered children under Bidler. If you genuinely believe that these people will be marshalled for sabotage actions to prevent that, which would require like I said a militant labor movement capable of taking key areas of produKKKtion [🏅 ＡｌｒｅａｄｙＳａｉｄＴｈｉｓＡｗａｒｄ], you are delusional. You want "better worKKKing KKKonditions" via legiϟϟlation which is effortlessly rolled back, in order to get faster access to an aϟϟet market which is visibly disintegrating. It becomes a Blue No Matter Who movement because that's who you organiϟϟe with and it is your "harm reduKKKtion" philoϟϟophy