54
this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2026
54 points (98.2% liked)
World News
40136 readers
1232 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'd choose the side that didn't deliberately mass kill civilians, didn't force women from occupied territories into prostitution, didn't perform forced lethal medical experiments on civilians, ....
Damn, what happened to 'the discussion of “who is more criminal” or which killing is Genocide and which is just “mass killing” is pointless to me.'?
Seems like you only apply that logic in one direction... White supremacist scumbag that you are.
Lets pretend all those things are true: there is no such option, you must choose the lesser evil. Kind of like how liberals insisted that people had to vote for Palestinian genocide. Where's that "don't let perfect be the enemy of good" energy now?
You think you're making a point but you're only showing that you have no idea that Churchill did all of those things.
https://eu.northjersey.com/story/opinion/contributors/2018/03/05/opinion-recalling-dark-side-winston-churchill/396051002/
Churchill was guilty of many of those in India.
The allies did deliberstly killed civilians too. Hitler was simply the bigger war criminal. Many of the allies was also mass killing civilians in colonized countries