this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
122 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
42587 readers
437 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The article is correct. You are misinterpreting the writer: "...forcing the evacuation of more than 150,000 people. More than 2,000 die in the process." An event (Nuclear plant disaster) forced evacuation of people. That evacuation (from the area due to the nuclear plant disaster) resulted in 2000 deaths.
There were over 2000 deaths directly related to the evacuation order. No known deaths from radiation related events. Here are some links and quotes from a few places to show consensus on this.
"Official figures show that there have been 2313 disaster-related deaths among evacuees from Fukushima prefecture. Disaster-related deaths are in addition to the about 19,500 that were killed by the earthquake or tsunami." - World Nuclear Association, a think tank and pro nuclear policy group.
No deaths nor discernible increase in cancer rates - UNSCEAR Report, 2013, a UN agency
And if you want to deep dive:
https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/site/portal-english/en-1-2-1.html
https://fukushima.jaea.go.jp/en/report/database/