this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
106 points (98.2% liked)

Steam Hardware

21629 readers
74 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is for multiplying your fps by 3x or 4x, but the input lag, ghosting, stuttering, and other issues make everything worse. Overall I'd recommend sticking to lossless scaling at 2x or not using framegen at all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] AngryMob@lemmy.one 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your concept of halving the framerate is wrong though... If you're natively at 100fps, each frame takes 10ms to render. Enable frame gen and you get 10ms of additional latency (plus the latency from generating the frame itself which is often 1 or 2ms). Thats a lot less than you would claim, which would be 20+ms from feeling like 50fps.

Its more comparable to the latency from vsync if anything, which people have been using for decades even on 30fps content.

There are plenty of tests that show this online, you dont need to even napkin math it out like this.

[โ€“] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What? Your numbers are right, if you were running the game at 100FPS it would take 10ms to render a frame. Plus your 10ms of additional latency from holding the frame. 10ms + 10ms is 20ms.

If you were running the game natively at 50FPS, it would take 20ms to render a frame. That's the same number. The total input lag from rendering is identical. Add in the slowdown from your GPU rendering the in-betweens and it's even worse.

VSync may complicate this though, depending on the method, since you may already be holding a frame for some amount of time, I hadn't considered that. I personally use VRR, so it isn't much on my setup.