this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
116 points (98.3% liked)

Asklemmy

53709 readers
644 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Yesterday, a Declaration of the trafficking of enslaved Africans and Racialized Chattel Enslavement of Africans as the Gravest Crime against Humanity was voted at UNO. As usual, Israel and the USA voted against. How did your country vote? Any thoughts about it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There's normally a reason when that assortment of countries chooses to abstain (the no voters are normally just evil). In this case it's likely the use of the word "gravest". I'd say the holocaust was worse, at least in the slave trade the people were just a means to an end. The holocaust involved torture by design and aimed to erase an entire religion.

Others may disagree, but there's at least room for doubt on the declaration that it's the "gravest".

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

EU's stated reason for abstaining is

1, use of superlatives

2, bias in presentation, against UN charter

3, they're against reparations

https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/un-new-york/eu-explanation-vote-%E2%80%93-un-general-assembly-action-a80l48-declaration-trafficking-enslaved-africans_en

I dunno man, it really just smells like they don't want to pay up for their crimes against humanity. When your first two points are nit picking and your last one is "and we were told we wouldn't have to answer for shitty things before we made rules about it", it's kinda giving away why you're against it.

[–] CactusEcho@piefed.social -3 points 4 hours ago

I dunno man, it really just smells like they don’t want to pay up for their crimes against humanity

Why does it counts only from 17th century onwards? Why only for 1 specific situation?