this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
87 points (97.8% liked)

politics

29087 readers
1599 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Billionaire Elon Musk’s offer to pay TSA personnel during the partial government shutdown poses “great legal challenges,” according to the White House.

The world’s richest man recently shared a social media post offering to pay TSA employees amid the Department of Homeland Security shutdown, which began in mid-February after lawmakers failed to reach a deal on funding the agency. TSA employees are working without pay which has led to staffing shortages and long security lines at airports nationwide.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically it's not a lack of funds it's a lack of appropriations.

So even if we taxed billionaires till there were no more billionaires, TSA can't get paid till Congress sets money aside to do so.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

TSA is suffering because of their sister organization ICE. That said, TSA just needs to be abolished, things worked much better before they existed. Let the airports pay for their own x-ray operators and just skip the mandatory groping, metal detectors worked better anyway.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

Has anything really even proven TSA has made flying safer? I've seen studies that show weapons and shit still get passed them on a regular basis. Meanwhile; Judy gets pulled aside and her luggage rummaged through and her 4 oz. bottle of lotion is confiscated, thank God I feel safe now!

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, literally all of DHS was created in 02...

So the logical thing would be to say just to get rid of DHS and revert to pre-9/11 measures.

But don't let facts get in the way of your opinions.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not quite sure what the attitude is for, I don't disagree with anything you said. Whether it's all of DHS or just TSA, either way there's no point in it existing.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The point is...

People should at least know what the thing they're advocating to abolish actually is, or they're running off the same logic as trumpets.

And that train of thinking is dangerous for reasons that should be readily apparent.

Ignorance is dangerous, if people trying to help you upsets you, then you're gonna stay ignorant and be a danger to the rest of us...

I take your actual danger to everyone else as a bigger issue than you're feelings about how people should help you.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

I don't understand what you're so upset about here. I'm well aware of what the DHS and TSA are, I'm older than both and remember how flying used to be before the TSA came in and screwed it all up. What makes you think I don't know what the TSA is?