145
Woman yells ‘tourist’ before ramming Key West cyclist with minivan, fleeing, cops say
(www.local10.com)
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
145 points (97.4% liked)
Fuck Cars
15376 readers
16 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How are you going to live in a place that's 97% reliant on tourism and then be mad that you saw a single tourist?
Weird thing to focus on. Tourists can be incredibly annoying. Not everyone can just move instantly due to that fact. But regardless the problem here is not that she wrongly judges tourists in general, it's that she is a murderous psychopath.
Weird to comment on the motive? If the driver had shouted a slur before hitting this person, would that be a weird thing to focus on?
If the psycho had said "damn Mexicans!" While living in texas and then commiting the same crime, and then the commenter said "why would you live in Texas if you hate Mexicans?" Then yeah that seems equally a weird thing to focus on. It's not like if she lived somewhere without people she hated it would make her any less hateful.
I can see the perspective you've laid out, though in a broad sense, when a person commits a wrongdoing of any sort, is it not reasonable to ask and discuss why they did the thing? Seems reasonable to me.
When the discussion is "she shouldn't live there if she is annoyed by tourists", then no. That's just op feeling defensive.
The discussion was 'the motivation for this action is x', followed by 'talking about the motivation at all is weird'. The minutiae isn't relevant to my initial point.
This seems to boil down to what is considered 'weird' behaviour. I guess I have a different view than you do as to what is strange to have a discussion about.
It will always be weird to defend tourists and that's obviously all this was. Maybe you can point to any value of the discussion that I missed? "Wah tourists are good for you" is not valuable imo
See I think we have different interpretations of the parent comment. You've read it as a critique of tourism and consider it "obviously all this was".
I read that same comment and see the pondering thought of 'why not move if you dislike it so much?' in the same way I would if this were a story of a tenth generation Texan being angry about the heat and expressing that anger via some violent measure.
The comment doesn't read as 'tourism is the problem' to me at all, which has been why I've described it as a comment on motivation and see it as a valid discussion point. Even when I reread it and play around with where emphasis might be in the sentence if it had been spoken aloud and not written, it feels like a stretch to say it's either pro or anti tourist.
Sort of a flaw with quick off the cuff comments in a text based medium, but oh well.
Key west has been a tourist area for a good hundred years. Are you really excusing her that she had no time to move out, nor did the last three generations of her ancestors?
Doesn't matter if it has been a tourist area for 10,000 years. Whether or not she should live there has absolutely no relevance whatsoever to whether or not she is allowed to be a psycho. The answer will always be no
I think the subtext here is that you are typically the annoying tourist (and thus defensive of something irrelevant to anything) and I'm typically annoyed by the tourists where I live. I'm not moving and I'm not hurting anyone either. I'm allowed to be annoyed. People are stupid and even more so on vacation.
No, I think the subtext is that it's asinine to be annoyed* by tourists, especially when you live in a place who's economy depends on them
Yeah I'm aware that annoying tourists cry in this very manner. Oh God guys my common understandable opinion is ASININE. The humanity!
I don't live in some place that would be a shithole if not for tourists. But even if I did, people who have zero spatial awareness would still be annoying.
So, you understand how all this comes off as you running defense for someone that purposely rammed a person on a bicycle? Because it seems like you don't understand that. I want to know if this is a bit, or if you're really just this dense
It isn't and it doesn't. What a weird troll
I thought it was that she used a car.