Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
view the rest of the comments
The discussion was 'the motivation for this action is x', followed by 'talking about the motivation at all is weird'. The minutiae isn't relevant to my initial point.
This seems to boil down to what is considered 'weird' behaviour. I guess I have a different view than you do as to what is strange to have a discussion about.
It will always be weird to defend tourists and that's obviously all this was. Maybe you can point to any value of the discussion that I missed? "Wah tourists are good for you" is not valuable imo
See I think we have different interpretations of the parent comment. You've read it as a critique of tourism and consider it "obviously all this was".
I read that same comment and see the pondering thought of 'why not move if you dislike it so much?' in the same way I would if this were a story of a tenth generation Texan being angry about the heat and expressing that anger via some violent measure.
The comment doesn't read as 'tourism is the problem' to me at all, which has been why I've described it as a comment on motivation and see it as a valid discussion point. Even when I reread it and play around with where emphasis might be in the sentence if it had been spoken aloud and not written, it feels like a stretch to say it's either pro or anti tourist.
Sort of a flaw with quick off the cuff comments in a text based medium, but oh well.